Byju's opponent, Aakash, petitions NCLT to include Ernst & Young (EY) in court proceedings, accusing them of conflict of interest in Byju's dispute.

Aakash Pushes Back Against EY in Byju's Case: Alleges Conflict of Interest and Abuse of Process

Byju's opponent, Aakash, petitions NCLT to include Ernst & Young (EY) in court proceedings, accusing them of conflict of interest in Byju's dispute.

It's a nasty mess at the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Bengaluru, as Aakash Educational Services Ltd (AESL) accuses Ernst & Young (EY) of playing both sides in the ongoing dispute with Byju's. In a June 1 impleadment application, AESL stated that EY's dual role as advisor and insolvency professional constitutes a classic case of conflict of interest.

AESL's Case Against EY

AESL alleges that EY has advised on various strategic, financial, and compliance matters for both companies, yet is now acting against AESL through Shailendra Ajmera, the appointed Resolution Professional (RP) of Byju's. The appointment of Ajmera is problematic, AESL claims, as he is also a senior EY functionary.

Evidence and Allegations

According to AESL's filing, EY's involvement includes advising on the valuation and structuring of non-convertible debentures (NCDs), tax and regulatory aspects of equity conversion, and internal board-level decisions at AESL. Evidence supporting the claims includes internal emails and advisory documents that hint at EY's engagement in financial forecasting, liquidity management, and decision-making processes.

Ajmera's Questionable Position

AESL accuses Ajmera of suppressing material facts, lack of locus standi, and acting beyond his powers as an RP under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The company argues that Ajmera should maintain the proceedings as a "member" of the company, which is a statutory requirement.

Escalating Matters

If AESL's concerns are not addressed, the company has threatened to escalate the matter to regulators like the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

EY's Response

While the RP has remained silent on the allegations, EY released a statement, claiming that they refute the allegations and will defend any legal action vigorously.

Background of the Dispute

This legal battle stems from Byju's acquisition of AESL in 2021, which faced governance concerns after the Chaudhry family, AESL's promoters, refused to exchange their remaining stake in the company. The ensuing legal struggle has been bitter and prolonged, with shareholders, Ranjan Pai's Manipal Group, Blackstone, the Chaudhary family, and Byju's all having a say in matters.

[1] Nestle Bolsters Capacity with Investment, Focuses on Renewable Energy and Thermal Power[2] Legal Battle Escalates in Ongoing Corporate and Insolvency Disputes[3] Aakash Issues Legal Notice to EY over Conflict of Interest Concerns[4] Byju's Makes Moves in Multi-Million Dollar Corporate Dispute[5] Aakash Educational Services Ltd v. Byju’s - Battle for Control Heats Up

Sources:[1] business-standard.com[2] india.com[3] livemint.com[4] economictimes.indiatimes.com[5] mythril.in

1. The financial involvement of Ernst & Young (EY) in both Aakash Educational Services Ltd (AESL) and Byju's, as advisor and insolvency professional, has come under scrutiny, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest, especially in the market of decentralized finance (defi) and traditional exchange.
2. In the ongoing dispute, AESL has presented evidence suggesting EY's role extended to financial forecasting, liquidity management, and decision-making processes, which could negatively impact business operations and regulatory compliance in these areas.
3. The allegations against EY have prompted calls for increased scrutiny of corporate liquidity and business practices, particularly with regards to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), as the case highlights potential issues of conflict of interest and abuse of process within the finance sector.

Read also: