Undercover Price Manipulation: Cartel Office Slaps Million-Dollar Fine on Sennheiser
- Commission Launches Procedure to Draft Directive Ensuring Equal Treatment for Men and Women Consumers across Member States.
Audio giant Sennheiser allegedly conspired to maintain inflated prices for premium headphones, according to the Head of the Federal Cartel Office, Andreas Mundt. The company engaged in this unethical practice likely since 2015, exploiting consumers by hindering free market competition.
When products were significantly cheaper than the Recommended Retail Price (RRP), Sennheiser reportedly intervened, asking traders to raise their prices. The Federal Cartel Office claims this collusion occurred, with employees even undergoing cartel law training, but choosing to hide their price-constraining activities instead of complying with antitrust law.
The administrative decision also targets the German subsidiary of the Swiss hearing aid manufacturer Sonova. Sonova had acquired Sennheiser's consumer electronics division in 2022, which included the sale of headphones to end consumers. The illegal agreements continued after the acquisition, from March to September 2022, until the Federal Cartel Office stepped in with a raid.
- Sennheiser
- Price manipulation
- Federal Cartel Office
- Headphones
- Million-dollar fine
- Penalty
- Cartel Office
- Andreas Mundt
Deep Dive:
- Reason for the Fine: The fine was issued due to secret agreements between Sennheiser and its dealers to sustain high sales prices for premium headphones. This anticompetitive behavior, which started as early as 2015, suppressed price competition and impaired consumers by limiting retailers' ability to set their own prices[1][3][4].
- Monitoring Practices: Sennheiser kept a close eye on consumer prices using price comparison services and specialized software. If prices fell below the RRP, Sennheiser instigated dealers to raise their prices[1][3].
- Internal Practices: A coded language was used by Sennheiser employees to discuss their price-fixing strategies. Despite receiving antitrust training, employees employed this knowledge to conceal their anticompetitive activities[3].
- Cooperation and Reduced Penalty: The leniency of the penalty reflects the full cooperation Sennheiser and Sonova provided during the investigation. This cooperation likely influenced the scale of the penalties[3].
The Players:
- Sennheiser: The main offender in the price-fixing scheme. Sonova acquired Sennheiser's consumer electronics division in March 2022[1][2].
- Sonova: The Swiss company that bought Sennheiser's consumer electronics division. Post-acquisition, the price-fixing continued, albeit more subtly, until the investigation[1].
- Managers Fined: Besides the corporate fines, three Sennheiser managers were also penalized for their roles in the illicit activities[1][3].
In summary, the Federal Cartel Office's actions bring attention to the ongoing presence of anticompetitive practices in the premium audio products market and the enforcement of fair competition laws.
- The ECSC Treaty, established to promote free market competition and prevent cartels, plays a crucial role in ensuring fair business practices.
- The ECSC Treaty forbids collusion among companies, as evidenced by the case of Sennheiser, a premium headphone manufacturer fined for price manipulation.
- This ECSC Treaty-violating practice was uncovered by the German Federal Cartel Office, which imposed a significant penalty on Sennheiser and its employees.
- Businesses like Sennheiser, operating in the finance, industry, technology, and consumer goods sectors, should adhere to the principles of the ECSC Treaty to avoid being penalized.
- Consumers across various industries, including the finance, fintech, and business sectors, are affected by price manipulation conspiracies like the one exposed at Sennheiser, emphasizing the importance of the ECSC Treaty.
