Engaging exclusively on the subject matter at hand
In a recent blog post by Gerlinde Sommer, the topic of de-bureaucratization and deregulation has taken center stage. The demand for less bureaucracy is currently a campaign slogan in many parts of the world, but as Sommer argues, this call for change is not always as straightforward as it seems.
The blog highlights the misuse of de-bureaucratization as a means to reduce workers' rights and extend working hours. Deregulation, like regulation, can be beneficial or detrimental, and can also seem useful for certain interest groups. However, it's essential to remember that deregulation often aims to cut regulations, but its benefits are not always for the benefit of all.
One of the favorite targets of supposed de-bureaucratizers is the protection of Sundays. Extending daily working hours or allowing more Saturday work is sometimes presented as supposed freedom, but it's not de-bureaucratization. Reduction of workers' rights is often suggested under the guise of de-bureaucratization, which can lead to reduced workplace safety, lower wages, and diminished job security.
For instance, deregulation efforts such as those from the U.S. Department of Labor under President Trump have sought to repeal or weaken numerous workplace protections, including minimum wage and overtime rules, workplace safety enforcement, and anti-discrimination policies. Critics argue these moves put workers at greater risk of injury and economic insecurity, undermining decades of legal protections.
From a productivity perspective, some deregulation reforms have shown increases in total factor productivity and labor productivity. However, these gains often disproportionately benefit capital owners, as evidenced by a decline in the labor share of value added, indicating that workers may not share equally in the resulting wealth.
In a broader political and economic debate, groups like the Competitive Enterprise Institute argue that deregulation reduces burdens on businesses, spurs innovation, and limits government overreach and cronyism. Yet, this perspective often contrasts with concerns from labor advocates emphasizing protections lost in the deregulation process.
The blog does not provide specific details about de-bureaucratization and deregulation efforts in the country. Nevertheless, it serves as a reminder that this is a matter of power politics, not de-bureaucratization. As Sommer concludes, the issue of bureaucracy in the country is complex and requires careful consideration to ensure that the benefits of deregulation are shared equitably among all stakeholders.
If you're interested in learning more about this topic, you can reach out to Gerlinde Sommer at g.sommer@ourwebsite.
[1] [Citation] [2] [Citation] [3] [Citation] [4] [Citation]
Finance and politics intertwine when discussing deregulation, as the U.S. Department of Labor's deregulation efforts, such as the repeal or weakening of workplace protections, can adversely impact workers' rights and result in decreased workplace safety, lower wages, and diminished job security, according to a recent blog post. The general news reveals that deregulation, while presented as de-bureaucratization, is part of power politics and its benefits often disproportionately favor capital owners in business.
