Financial regulatory body BIS examines potential instability factors linked to Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and cryptocurrencies as they approach a significant growth threshold, commonly referred to as "critical mass."

Financial regulatory body BIS examines potential instability factors linked to Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and cryptocurrencies as they approach a significant growth threshold, commonly referred to as "critical mass."

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has released a paper exploring the potential financial stability risks that arise from the expanding linkages between cryptocurrencies, decentralized finance (DeFi), and traditional finance (TradFi).

The paper identifies several areas of concern, including increased systemic risk through interconnectedness, challenges in regulatory oversight, operational and security vulnerabilities, risks associated with stablecoins, illiquidity and contagion risks, and illicit activity and fraud concerns.

Increased Systemic Risk

As DeFi and crypto assets become more intertwined with TradFi systems, shocks in the crypto ecosystem (e.g., price crashes, insolvency events) could propagate to the traditional financial sector, undermining stability.

Regulatory Challenges

The decentralized and global nature of DeFi complicates the application and enforcement of existing TradFi regulations, potentially leaving significant risks unmonitored or inadequately controlled.

Operational and Security Vulnerabilities

Crypto and DeFi systems face heightened cybersecurity risks, including hacking, fraud, and vulnerabilities in smart contracts or tokenized assets that can cause rapid loss of value and investor confidence, potentially cascading through connected TradFi entities.

Risks Associated with Stablecoins

Stablecoins, often used as payment methods within both crypto and TradFi, operate without full regulatory backing or legal guarantees to holders, increasing liquidity and redemption risks. Their failure or loss of peg could have spillover effects on traditional payment systems.

Illiquidity and Contagion Risks

The novel financial instruments and tokenized assets in DeFi may not have sufficient market depth or legal protections, increasing the chance of market freezes, runs, or contagion effects that impact TradFi participants linked to these assets.

Illicit Activity and Fraud Concerns

The intersection of DeFi, stablecoins, and TradFi can facilitate illicit finance and fraud, challenging anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-financing of terrorism (CFT) efforts, which if unaddressed, could threaten the integrity and trust critical to financial stability.

In summary, the BIS paper underscores that the growing integration of crypto and DeFi with conventional financial institutions raises complex risks—operational, regulatory, market liquidity, and systemic contagion—which require enhanced regulatory frameworks and cooperation to preserve global financial stability.

Future Study Areas

The authors consider the financial stability implications of real world asset (RWA) tokenization and the systemic risks of tighter linkages between DeFi and TradFi as important areas for future study. They also suggest further research to explore the role of decentralized autonomous organization (DAOs) in governance and how regulators could engage with them.

Moreover, the paper expresses concerns beyond crypto, such as TradFi starting to use DeFi smart contracts within TradFi, the cryptoisation of emerging market economies, and the need to safeguard the interest of market participants in DeFi.

Mainstream Adoption

Decentralized exchanges (DEXs) could start to be used more widely by TradFi firms and become part of the mainstream. The issuance of Bitcoin ETFs and the expansion of stablecoins and RWA tokenization are changing the minimal linkages between crypto and TradFi.

The paper concludes that the crypto market has "reached critical mass" but still considers it as having minimal linkages to traditional finance (TradFi). However, the changing landscape necessitates ongoing monitoring and research to mitigate the identified risks and ensure financial stability.

The UK consultation also suggests a potential new legal role of "establishing or operating a protocol" in DeFi. The authors propose imposing similar requirements to TradFi on DeFi, including know your customer compliance, disclosures, and adequate training and qualifications for market professionals.

[1] BIS (2023). Financial stability risks from decentralised finance. Bank for International Settlements. [2] BIS (2022). Stablecoins: prospects and challenges. Bank for International Settlements. [3] BIS (2021). Central bank digital currencies: foundational principles and core features. Bank for International Settlements. [4] BIS (2020). Crypto-assets: beyond the hype. Bank for International Settlements.

1. The BIS paper suggests that increased interconnectedness between cryptocurrencies, decentralized finance, and traditional finance could potentially undermine financial stability, as shocks in the crypto ecosystem could propagate to the traditional financial sector.
2. The decentralized and global nature of DeFi poses challenges in the application and enforcement of existing traditional finance regulations, potentially leaving significant risks unmonitored or inadequately controlled.
3. Crypto and DeFi systems face operational and security vulnerabilities, such as hacking, fraud, and vulnerabilities in smart contracts or tokenized assets, which can cause rapid loss of value and investor confidence and potentially impact traditional financial entities.
4. Stablecoins, often used as payment methods in both crypto and traditional finance, operate without full regulatory backing or legal guarantees, increasing liquidity and redemption risks, and their failure or loss of peg could have spillover effects on traditional payment systems.
5. The intersection of DeFi, stablecoins, and traditional finance has the potential to facilitate illicit finance and fraud, making it challenging to enforce anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism efforts, which could threaten financial stability if unaddressed.

Read also: