Bundestag Members' Bumper Salaries: The Great Debate Continues
Parliament's Persistent, Self-Operative Documentation System Remains Intact - German Legislative Body Holds Session
Hold onto your hats, folks! We're diving headfirst into the juicy world of political dough, as we unravel the saga of the German Bundestag's hefty allowances, a.k.a. Diet, that's got everyone talking.
The recent decision by the Bundestag, led by the CDU/CSU, SPD, and the Greens, to prolong the automatic compensation mechanism has rekindled the firestorm of controversy. But how much moolah are we actually talking about here?
As of now, members of the Bundestag pocket a cool €11,227.20 monthly, before taxes. That's not all - they also enjoy a tax-free monthly expense allowance of €5,349.58 for expenses incurred during mandate execution, including rent, materials, taxi rides, hotel bills, or accommodation in Berlin.
Throw in extra perks like a reimbursed office in Berlin (up to €12,000 annually), free trains, and cost coverage for domestic flights, and you've got yourself one hefty paycheck!
But wait, there's more!
The Basic Law grants members a claim to an appropriate allowance that ensures their independence while maintaining their responsibilities and the importance of the office. The specifics are laid out in the Members' Act, oriented towards the remuneration of judges at the highest federal courts.
It's always been a touchy subject - if the Diet's too low, members are susceptible to bribery. If it's too high, criticism ensues. The Bundestag itself votes on its Diet, as per the Diet Decision of the Federal Constitutional Court, which beseeches members to do so in the public eye.
The Spicy History of Automatic Adjustments
The practice of automatic yearly adjustments was introduced in 2014 by the grand coalition, on the advice of an expert commission. This move was motivated by the heated debates that led to claims of politicians being 'greedy' or 'self-serving' during Diet increases.
By tying the Diet to the country's average wage increases, political debates were supposed to be minimized. However, each newly elected Bundestag must vote on whether to maintain this practice for the legislative period. And as usual, debate and controversy ensue!
Fists Fly as Critics and Supporters Square Off
The SPD and Union argue that the automatism is a fact-based approach, beneficial even during hard times when citizens take a hit. The Left party, meanwhile, calls for a halt to these automatic adjustments, wondering aloud why allowances increase before the parliament gets down to business.
Stephan Brandner (AfD) advocates for the scrutiny of annual increases in the plenary, while Jens Spahn (CDU) defends the automatism as a reasonable response to a highly emotional and political issue.
Stay tuned for the latest twists and turns in this never-ending game of political punch and counterpunch!
If you're intrigued and can't get enough of German politics, don't forget to subscribe to our free capital newsletter for the lowdown on the most important bits!
[1] According to the Left party, the mechanism will result in an allowance increase of approximately €600 from July 2025.
- The controversial issue of Bundestag members' allowances, known as Diet, has once again ignited a debate, particularly regarding the extension of the automatic compensation mechanism, which is a policy and legislation matter rooted in politics and general news.
- As part of personal-finance management, it is important to understand that Bundestag members receive a monthly salary of €11,227.20, before taxes, and a tax-free monthly expense allowance of €5,349.58, in addition to other perks such as a reimbursed office in Berlin, free trains, and cost coverage for domestic flights.
- The Left party has expressed concern over the automatic adjustments to the Bundestag's allowances, questioning why the increases occur before the parliament begins its work, and arguing for their abolition, while the SPD and Union support the fact-based approach of the automatism, viewing it as beneficial even during difficult economic times.
