Skip to content

Inquiry into the perpetrators of Musk Platform disruptions ensues

Cyberattack on X Linked to Pro-Palestine Group Dark Storm, as Elon Musk Shows Interest in Ukraine

Inquiry into the perpetrators of Musk Platform disruptions ensues

Rewritten Article:

Updates, March 12, 2025: This article, initially published on March 11, has been revised with additional insights from several security experts regarding the DDoS attack targeting Elon Musk's X social media platform.

Cyber threats come in various shapes and sizes, from PayPal scam campaigns to infostealer malware. However, distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks can inflict significant havoc on platforms like Elon Musk's X social media platform (formerly known as Twitter).

DDoS Attack on X - New Insights and Suspects

Following the recurring outages on X on March 10, Elon Musk swiftly attributed the issues to a massive cyberattack. He suggested that either a large and coordinated group, a nation, or both might be responsible. Now, a potential culprit has emerged as the pro-Palestinian hacktivist collective called Dark Storm has claimed responsibility for bringing down X. Musk's statements regarding the IP addresses originating in the Ukraine area remain ambiguous regarding the connection.

While Dark Storm has a history of using tactics similar to the Russia-linked group KillNet, which attacked western targets and organizations supporting Ukraine, it later transformed into an attack-for-hire service. First observed in 2023, Dark Storm carried out large-scale DDoS campaigns and ransomware attacks against NATO countries, Israel, the US, and more.

Dark Storm announced its responsibility for the X DDoS attack in its Telegram channel, saying, "Twitter has been taken offline by Dark Storm Team." They also shared screenshots from Check Host, a tool often utilized by DDoS attack groups to demonstrate ongoing attacks through site availability from multiple global servers.

Oded Vanunu, chief technologist and head of product vulnerability at Check Point, commented, "The resurgence of Dark Storm highlights the growing cyber threat against major online platforms and critical infrastructure. Users should expect disrupted services, downtime, and limited access to essential websites and apps."

While the Check Host screenshots or the Telegram postings cannot establish definitive proof of Dark Storm's involvement, this story will continue to evolve as more information comes to light.

Forbes:

Forbes: Urgent Password Warning for 650 Million Users

BlackRock CEO Warns Amid $1 Trillion Bitcoin and Crypto Price Sell-Off

iOS 18.3.2: Apple's Latest iPhone Update Brings One Fix, One Frustration

NYT Mini Hints, Clues, and Answers for Thursday, March 13

Cyberattack Attribution Remains Complex, Experts Say

Unraveling the Mystery: Can We Trace the X DDoS Attack?

Tracing a cyberattack to a particular nation or group is a complex process. Several security experts who shared their views following the X DDoS attack agreed with this sentiment. "DDoS attacks are quite common and are even offered as a service," said Chad Cragle, chief information security officer at Deepwatch. However, thorough forensic analysis is required for definitive attribution, which goes beyond basic IP tracing. Claims of responsibility, such as those made by Dark Storm, should not be considered conclusive proof.

The actual cause of the X outages will necessitate independent verification, as direct access to the targeted infrastructure (in this case, X itself) would be crucial. "The evidence from X and the attackers claiming credit appears extremely limited," said J Stephen Kowski, field chief technology officer at SlashNext Email Security+.

Regardless, the magnitude of this incident suggests the involvement of a sophisticated threat actor, be it a nation-state or hacktivist group, according to Tom Parker, chief technology officer at NetSPI. "However, attributing an attack of this scale remains inherently difficult due to the adversaries' ability to conceal their tracks," Parker concluded. It is essential to exercise caution in pointing fingers without clear and compelling evidence demonstrating the attacker's capability, motive, and likely benefits.

Forbes:

Forbes: Urgent Password Reset Warning for 1Password Users

$Trump Coin Attack Leads to Swift Password Theft in Just 2 Minutes

  1. Despite the claims by Dark Storm, definitive attribution of the DDoS attack on Elon Musk's X social media platform requires thorough forensic analysis, as simple IP tracing is not enough.
  2. Elon Musk's statements suggesting a connection between the X DDoS attack and IP addresses originating in the Ukraine area remain ambiguous, and independent verification of the actual cause is necessary.
  3. Security experts, following the X DDoS attack, warned against considering claims of responsibility, like those made by Dark Storm, as conclusive proof, as attributing such large-scale attacks remains inherently difficult due to the adversaries' ability to conceal their tracks.

Read also:

    Latest