Skip to content

Proposal for European Commission Regulations on Pre-Marketing Activities in Alternative Investment Funds

European Commission's efforts to promote competition in the cross-border investment fund sector do not automatically lead to the liberalization of that market by default

Proposal for Regulation of Pre-Marketing Activities by Alternative Investment Fund Managers, as...
Proposal for Regulation of Pre-Marketing Activities by Alternative Investment Fund Managers, as proposed by the European Commission under AIFMD.

Proposal for European Commission Regulations on Pre-Marketing Activities in Alternative Investment Funds

The European Commission has introduced a new concept of "pre-marketing" in its amendment of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), allowing European Union Alternative Investment Fund Managers (EU AIFMs) to communicate investment ideas to potential professional investors before formally marketing an Alternative Investment Fund (AIF).

Under the updated AIFMD rules, the pre-marketing regime explicitly applies only to EU AIFMs marketing via an EU passport. However, some EU Member States might impose similar pre-marketing restrictions on non-EU (including US) fund managers under national private placement regimes (NPPRs).

For US fund managers offering strategies to European investors, this development presents several implications.

Pre-Marketing Regulations for US Managers

  1. The pre-marketing regime under the updated AIFMD applies primarily to EU AIFMs marketing via an EU passport. However, some EU Member States might impose similar pre-marketing restrictions on non-EU fund managers under NPPRs.
  2. US fund managers typically rely on NPPR to market their funds in Europe, but this approach comes with limitations and challenges. For instance, NPPRs are not available in key markets like France, Italy, and Spain; some countries require a depositary; deregistration is required if fundraising is unsuccessful; and reporting is complex and country-specific.
  3. To gain broader and more streamlined access across Europe, US fund managers may need to launch EU-domiciled parallel funds managed by an EU-authorized AIFM and use the AIFMD marketing passport. This approach facilitates compliance with harmonized EU marketing rules, including pre-marketing, and can help avoid the fragmented national regimes.
  4. The introduction of the pre-marketing framework formalizes and harmonizes the process within the EU for early-stage communication with investors. However, US fund managers may need to adapt their marketing strategies if they want to operate under or alongside EU passports to remain competitive and compliant.

Impact on Cross-Border Fund Distribution

The amendments are intended to reduce regulatory barriers and costs for fund managers to offer their funds cross-border in Europe. The European Commission's proposed measures do not equate to a liberalization of the cross-border fund market, especially for third-country (non-European) managers and funds.

The new definition of pre-marketing under the proposed amendment is not entirely different from the common practice in European domiciles where pre-marketing is already possible. However, it does formalize and harmonize the process within the EU.

The European Commission has proposed a new concept of pre-marketing within the AIFMD ecosystem. The measures envisaged in the proposals aim at enhancing and facilitating European cross-border fund distribution by amending UCITS and AIFM directives.

However, the implementation of the third-country AIFMD passport, which allows non-EU AIFMs to market their funds in Europe, has been delayed. This could potentially restrict the ability of non-EU fund managers to offer their strategies to European investors.

In summary, while pre-marketing primarily targets EU AIFMs using the EU marketing passport, US managers face potential indirect effects through national rules and the need to consider EU-based structures to access European investors efficiently. They must carefully navigate pre-marketing communications and may need to partner with or establish EU-authorized AIFMs to fully benefit from the harmonized framework and broader EU market access.

[1] European Commission. (2018). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2011/61/EU on Alternative Investment Fund Managers and Directive 2009/65/EC on the Coordination of Laws, Regulations and Administrative Procedures relating to Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS). [2] European Commission. (2018). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a framework for the distribution of units and shares of UCITS and AIFs. [3] Attilio Veneziano. (2019). The New Pre-Marketing Regime under the AIFMD: What US Managers Need to Know. [Online]. Available: https://www.v-law.com/the-new-pre-marketing-regime-under-the-aifmd-what-us-managers-need-to-know/ [4] K&L Gates. (2018). European Commission Proposes Amendments to AIFMD and UCITS to Facilitate Cross-Border Distribution of Funds. [Online]. Available: https://www.klgates.com/european-commission-proposes-amendments-to-aifmd-and-ucits-to-facilitate-cross-border-distribution-of-funds-03-28-2018/

  1. US fund managers looking to offer strategies to European investors may need to adapt their marketing strategies to comply with pre-marketing regulations imposed by certain EU Member States under National Private Placement Regimes (NPPRs), which could involve establishing EU-domiciled parallel funds managed by an EU-authorized Alternative Investment Fund Manager (EU AIFM) and using the AIFMD marketing passport to access the European Union's harmonized marketing rules more efficiently.
  2. In the context of finance and business, the EU Commission's amendment of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), particularly the introduction of the pre-marketing framework, is aiming to facilitate cross-border fund distribution and support investing activities within the European Union by reducing regulatory barriers and costs for Alternative Investment Fund Managers (AIFMs).

Read also:

    Latest