Trump bolsters coal sector to fuel data centers' energy demand
In the latter half of 2025, the Trump administration took a significant step by declaring a "national energy emergency" and implementing executive orders to keep aging coal-fired power plants operational, such as the J.H. Campbell plant in Michigan and the Eddystone gas plant in Pennsylvania. These plants were originally scheduled to close based on cost and cleaner alternatives, but the administration's intervention has led to increased pollution and additional costs for consumers.
The orders, which have faced significant legal challenges and criticism, were intended to prevent electrical grid instability, job losses, energy security risks, and dependence on foreign energy sources. However, critics argue that these measures inhibit cleaner energy growth and hinder progress on emissions reductions.
One such plant, the J.H. Campbell coal-fired power plant in West Olive, Michigan, was due to close in May but was granted a 90-day emergency order to remain operational. This order, like the one issued for the Philadelphia gas plant, can be renewed.
The administration's actions have been met with mixed reactions. While the American Coal Council expresses optimism about the economic impacts of the orders, environmental groups and some industry experts argue that they are unlawful and harm the climate and public health.
The orders have not been explicitly aimed at or shown to have a direct impact on data centers or artificial intelligence (AI) tools. The focus has been on general grid reliability, fossil fuel energy generation, and regulatory delays.
As the world moves towards a more digital and data-driven future, the role of coal in meeting the demands of data centers and AI remains a complex issue. With data center-driven energy demand expected to double by 2030, and more than half of that energy demand expected from AI data centers, the future of energy generation will continue to be a topic of debate and discussion.
Meanwhile, the future of coal communities remains uncertain. Nearly 75% of US coal plants have retired or are planned to do so by 2030, according to Sierra Club tracking. The Trump administration's orders have been criticized for providing false hope and more pollution to these communities, while some argue that they are cutting these communities off from necessary resources for a transition to a cleaner energy future.
As the administration's orders set the stage for regulatory shifts, it remains to be seen how the energy landscape will evolve in the coming years. Several industry groups and major companies have declined to comment on the prospect of coal-fired electricity powering their data centres, adding to the uncertainty surrounding the future of coal and clean energy.
References:
- [Source 1]
- [Source 2]
- [Source 3]
- [Source 4]
- The energy transition towards renewable and clean energy sources, a critical part of meeting the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), is being hindered by the Trump administration's efforts to keep fossil fuel energy plants operational.
- The administration's net zero strategy, as demonstrated by its extended operation of the J.H. Campbell coal-fired power plant, is under fire for potentially increased carbon emissions, leading to climate change, and harm to public health.
- Despite the legal challenges and criticism, the administration's moves to delay the closure of inefficient, carbon-emitting power plants are justified by some in terms of energy security, grid stability, and job preservation in the industry.
- Finance and sustainability sectors are closely watching how these controversial moves will influence the investment landscape and the industry's commitment to large-scale emissions reductions in the years to come.
- As the world strives for a cleaner and more sustainable energy future, the role of finance in funding and promoting the growth of renewable energy sources will be crucial in deciding the balance between the economy and the environment.
