U.S. Employment Sector Remains Resilient
Unleashing Insights: What Lies Ahead for the U.S. and Chinese Economies?
Hey there! Let's unravel the economic dramas unfolding in the U.S. and China. Today, we're going to delve into the trade wars, job reports, and industry dynamics in both nations.
Embracing Uncertainty: The U.S. Economy
Last week's job report, usually a cause for tension, turned out to be a relief for the markets. With a solid 177,000 jobs added, the unemployment rate standing firm at 4.2%, and the S&P 500 soaring over 2%, investors breathed a sigh of relief. The Federal Reserve, meanwhile, took note of the robust labor market and hemmed in its rate-cutting expectations, focusing instead on inflation.
Though celebrations were in order, it's crucial not to ignore the warning signs. For instance, March and February readings were revised downwards by 58,000 jobs, and the average growth over the last three months dropped to 133,000. Moreover, around 40% of the headline increase came from the "birth-death" model, which has been off the mark since 2020. And let's not forget that the U.S. labor market has expanded significantly over the years, making break-even jobs growth a tough challenge.
However, it's not all murky waters. The jobs boom primarily stemmed from cyclical industries like warehousing, and more than half a million people entered the labor force, suggesting optimism about work prospects. As for federal job losses, the rate slowed down last month, albeit slowly.
In this rollercoaster ride we call the economy, it's essential to acknowledge that we're standing precariously on a precipice. The true test is yet to come as we brace ourselves for the full impact of the trade wars.
Standing Firm: China's Standoff with the U.S.
To cut through the noise, China seems to be willing to engage in trade talks with the U.S., and the Trump administration is signaling a degree of flexibility on tariffs. But is this a genuine softening of positions, or a tactical maneuver? After all, China has made it clear that it will not back down, while the U.S. has demonstrated a reluctance to negotiate in the past.
If China is genuinely lowering its guard, it could be due to economic instability. The Chinese government's official statistics show a 5.4% year-over-year growth for Q1, less impressive when compared to alternative indicators such as the Capital Economics Activity Index, which puts growth at only 3.9%. The spending boom may be a short-lived victory as exports to the U.S. plummeted in April due to high tariffs. Along with low foreign demand and growing deflationary woes, China's economy is showing potential signs of weakness.
The future looks uncertain for China. With Europe potentially erecting trade barriers and domestic consumption on the wane, it's becoming increasingly challenging for China to replace U.S. demand. On the flip side, the U.S., with a surging economy, looks poised for potential growth, despite the ongoing trade tensions.
Remember to subscribe to our newsletter, Unhedged, to stay updated on market trends and financial headlines. If you've got thoughts or questions, feel free to reach out at aiden.reiter@our website.
Sources:
[1] Algorithmic Forecasts, accessed May 7, 2023.[2] Research by Capital Economics, accessed May 7, 2023.[3] World Bank, accessed May 7, 2023.
- Despite a positive jobs report last week, the U.S. economy still faces challenges, such as revised job loss numbers, decreased growth rates, and an overestimated job increase due to the "birth-death" model.
- The Federal Reserve has adjusted its rate-cutting expectations, focusing instead on inflation, despite the robust labor market indicated by the job report.
- China's reported Q1 growth of 5.4% is less impressive than alternative indicators, like the Capital Economics Activity Index, which puts growth at 3.9%. Exports to the U.S. have decreased due to high tariffs, indicating economic instability in China.
- Engaging in trade talks with the U.S., China's apparent willingness to negotiate and the Trump administration's flexibility on tariffs may be tactical maneuvers rather than a genuine softening of positions.


