Skip to content

Workplace video surveillance under GDPR: legal guidelines and regulations

Attorney Mihaela Murariu, of Grecu Partners Business Law Firm, deliberates upon the potential dangers for corporations employing video monitoring of staff in Romania. Amidst contemporary times, the implementation of video surveillance devices within workplace settings has seen a significant surge.

Revamped Article:

In the hustle and bustle of today's business world, video surveillance has become a common sight in professional settings, with purposes ranging from safeguarding assets to ensuring employee safety. However, this practice comes with a significant question mark over the employees' right to privacy. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the national law, specifically Law no. 190/2018, set strict rules to prevent the misuse of video surveillance. Employers need to adhere to these rules to ensure a balance between their interests and employees' fundamental rights.

Now, let's dive into the nitty-gritty. According to Article 5 of the GDPR, personal data processing must abide by specific principles like legality, transparency, specific purpose, data minimization, and limited storage duration. This means that surveillance must have a legal basis, be transparent, serve a legitimate purpose, limit data collection, and keep data only for as long as necessary.

A recent fiasco by the Cluj-Napoca Public Transport Company demonstrates the repercussions of not complying with these regulations. The company was fined for illegally using audio-video surveillance systems in drivers' cabins, as the surveillance was carried out without a clear justification, violating the principles of legality, transparency, and purpose limitation. Moreover, the collected data was used for disciplinary sanctions against employees, a purpose initially unstated.

While the absence of video surveillance tools can lead to challenges like managing security and preventing theft, it's crucial to strike a balance. Employers must determine only necessary data should be collected and aim for less invasive methods if possible. The purpose of video surveillance is closely tied to the risks associated with the workplace activities.

Law 190/2018 provides additional clarifications for employee monitoring. Employers must justify their interest in surveillance, inform employees about the monitoring, and consult with social partners before installing surveillance systems. Moreover, alternative, less intrusive solutions should always be considered before implementing a monitoring system.

In conclusion, video surveillance should be implemented with utmost responsibility. The Cluj-Napoca Public Transport Company's case underscores the ease with which employees' and other data subjects' rights can be compromised through abusive practices. Employers are expected to demonstrate the necessity of surveillance, clearly inform affected individuals, and choose less invasive methods when possible.

For more information or queries, visit [email protected].

This article is Partner Content.

Photo source: 135335589 © Chernetskaya | Dreamstime.com

Key Insights from Enrichment:

  • GDPR requires that employers demonstrate a legitimate interest for surveillance, communicate reasons transparently, and adhere to data protection principles.
  • Law no. 190/2018 requires employers to provide justification and transparency, inform employees about the monitoring, consult social partners, and choose less invasive methods if possible.
  • Best practices include documenting policies, training personnel, and ensuring comprehensive data protection measures.
  1. The EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) necessitates employers to demonstrate a legitimate interest for surveillance, communicate these reasons transparently, and follow essential data protection principles in their video surveillance practices.
  2. Law no. 190/2018 enforces employers to provide justification for their surveillance, inform employees about the monitoring, consult with social partners before installing surveillance systems, and consider less intrusive solutions before implementing a monitoring system.
  3. Employers, especially in the data-and-cloud-computing industry, must strike a balance in their video surveillance activities by collecting only necessary data, being transparent about their practices, and striving for less invasive methods.
  4. To avoid a situation like the Cluj-Napoca Public Transport Company's fine for illegally using video surveillance systems, employers should ensure that their surveillance adheres to the principles of legality, transparency, specific purpose, data minimization, and limited storage duration, as set out in Article 5 of the GDPR.
  5. Best business practices for video surveillance involve documenting policies, training personnel, and implementing comprehensive data protection measures, as these are key factors in maintaining lawfulness and respecting employees' rights in the digital age.
Business attorney Mihaela Murariu, from Grecu Partners, discusses potential legal risks for companies employing video surveillance on staff in Romania. With the rise of video surveillance systems in the workplace, such practices are becoming more ubiquitous yet may carry legal implications.

Read also:

    Latest